KnowBe4 alternatives: the best options for Australian teams in 2026

KnowBe4 alternatives compared: published pricing bands, automation depth and who each option suits — from enterprise suites to per-seat platforms for Australian SMBs.

KnowBe4 is the best-known name in security awareness training — the largest template library in the market and the benchmark reports most of the industry quotes. It is also built and priced for enterprises: list pricing that assumes three-year terms, seat bands that only step down at volume, and an admin workload that needs a dedicated owner. That combination is why small and mid-sized teams go looking for alternatives. The best KnowBe4 alternative for an Australian business in 2026 is Cyber Aware if you want automated monthly training on per-seat pricing with no minimums; Proofpoint or Mimecast if awareness should ride on your email gateway; a free government program like CyberWardens if the budget is zero. This page compares each option on what actually decides the outcome: cadence automation, evidence you can hand to an auditor and the total cost of running the programme.

TL;DR

At a glance: KnowBe4 alternatives compared

ToolBest forStandout featurePublished 2026 priceHow it differs from KnowBe4
KnowBe4Large, multi-region enterprisesLargest template library plus industry benchmarking data$1.63–$3.75 per seat per month, three-year list termsThe incumbent you are comparing against
Cyber AwareAustralian SMBs and MSPsFully automated monthly cadence with human risk reportingPer-seat, no minimums — quoteSpecialist platform, not an enterprise suite
Proofpoint / MimecastOrgs already running those email gatewaysAwareness training bundled with email securityQuote onlyTraining sold alongside the gateway in one stack
HoxhuntEnterprise behaviour-change reportingSimulation-led coaching built around real inboxesQuote onlyCoaching-led rather than library-led
CyberWardensZero-budget awarenessGovernment-backed free content for Australian small businessFreeContent layer only — no simulation history or evidence

The KnowBe4 figures are its own published list pricing for the SAT Foundation and SAT Advanced tiers. Everything else quotes on request — which is itself part of the comparison. A platform with a per-seat rate and no minimums prices in one step; a suite prices after a sales cycle, and the quote can change with seat bands, term length and add-ons.

1. Cyber Aware: best KnowBe4 alternative for Australian small and mid-sized teams

Cyber Aware is a specialist security awareness platform built around one operating model: a short monthly lesson, a monthly phishing simulation, one-click reporting in Outlook or Gmail, and a per-learner risk score a manager can actually read. Directory sync enrols new starters and drops leavers automatically, and the campaign calendar builds a year of varied simulated attacks from one setup.

Cyber Aware pros:

Cyber Aware cons:

Best for: an owner or office manager who wants the programme to run itself in under an hour a month. The security awareness training page sets out the monthly model in full.

2. Proofpoint and Mimecast: best if awareness belongs with your email gateway

Both are enterprise email-security vendors that sell awareness training alongside their gateways, so the appeal is a single-vendor stack: one contract, one console, training that shares telemetry with the mail platform. For an organisation already standardised on one of these gateways, adding the awareness module is the lowest-friction procurement path.

Pros:

Cons:

Best for: enterprises of 1,000+ staff already running the gateway, where consolidation outweighs per-seat price.

3. Hoxhunt: best for enterprise behaviour-change reporting

Hoxhunt approaches awareness training through repeated, game-like simulations delivered into real inboxes, with coaching and leaderboards built around individual behaviour. Its reporting emphasis is behaviour change at scale rather than content breadth.

Pros:

Cons:

Best for: large organisations with a security team that wants to invest in behaviour-change metrics and has the budget to match.

4. CyberWardens: best free option

CyberWardens is a government-backed program giving Australian small businesses genuinely useful free awareness content. As a starting layer it is well worth using — plain-language guidance aimed exactly at businesses without security staff.

Pros:

Cons:

Best for: a zero-budget starting layer, with paid simulation and reporting layered on top once there is something to evidence.

Why teams switch from KnowBe4

When staying with KnowBe4 is the right call

If you run a large, multi-region enterprise with dedicated security staff, need deep integrations with an existing stack, and rely on the breadth of the template library plus the industry benchmarking data, KnowBe4 remains the safe incumbent. Switching platforms mid-contract to save a few per-seat dollars is rarely worth the migration; the alternatives on this page earn their place mostly below enterprise scale.

FAQ

What is the best KnowBe4 alternative in 2026? For Australian businesses under roughly 500 staff, Cyber Aware — automated monthly training and simulation on per-seat pricing with no minimums. Large enterprises already on Proofpoint or Mimecast gateways are better served by those suites' own awareness modules.

How much does KnowBe4 cost in 2026? Published list pricing runs $1.63–$2.40 per seat per month for SAT Foundation and $2.79–$3.75 for SAT Advanced, on three-year terms, with seats stepping down as volume rises.

Is there a free KnowBe4 alternative? CyberWardens provides free government-backed awareness content for Australian small businesses. It is a content layer, not a programme — it lacks simulation history and per-learner evidence.

Why is KnowBe4 expensive for small teams? Its tiers are built around seat bands and three-year terms that reward volume; below about 100 seats the effective per-seat rate is the highest in the band, and admin hours add to the total cost.

Can I run awareness training without IT staff? Yes — with directory sync, a self-scheduling campaign calendar and automated reports, a non-technical owner runs a full programme in under an hour a month.

What should I compare before switching platforms? Cadence automation, evidence exports, local lure realism and total monthly effort — in that order. Price decides the invoice; those four decide the outcome.

One last thing

Whatever platform you choose, run a baseline phishing simulation before announcing the programme. Every click-rate improvement you will ever report is measured against that first honest number — and switching platforms later does not change it.

Related guides

Ready to deploy

Same playbook.
Your brand.

Cyber Aware's Human Risk Score works the same way for every MSP partner - under your brand, on your cadence.