Choose Cyber Aware if you need awareness training, phishing simulations and gap assessments running as a platform with per-seat pricing and no minimums — choose CyberCX if you need practitioner-delivered consulting, enterprise-scope programmes and incident-response expertise under one roof.
TL;DR
- Cyber Aware wins on self-serve platform delivery: monthly cadence, auto-enrolment, per-seat pricing with no minimums.
- CyberCX wins on consulting depth: practitioner-delivered training, board briefings, and a workforce of 1,300+ across four countries.
- Both are Australian; they solve different problems — software running on a schedule versus professional services scoped per engagement.
- Cyber Aware maps training and gap assessments to Essential 8 and SMB1001; CyberCX ties training to its wider consulting and incident-response practice.
- Small SMBs and MSPs usually need Cyber Aware; enterprises buying a programme usually need CyberCX.
Cyberaware vs CyberCX: at a glance
| Dimension | Cyber Aware | CyberCX |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | SMBs and MSPs needing a self-running human-risk platform | Organisations buying consulting-led, practitioner-delivered training |
| Pricing model | Per-seat, no minimums | Engagement- and scope-based; rates not published |
| Standout feature | Auto Phish schedules a year of campaigns from one setup | Training delivered by active security practitioners |
| Delivery model | Software platform, automated monthly cadence | Professional services: workshops, modules, briefings |
| Framework mapping | Essential 8 and SMB1001 mapped out of the box | Ties training to GRC and compliance consulting |
| White-label | Portal, emails, reports and certificates carry the MSP's brand | Not a reseller product — consulting delivery |
| Scale fit | SMBs up to a few hundred seats; MSP multi-tenant | Mid-market to enterprise, national footprint |
Cyber Aware offers more automation
Cyber Aware runs as software: Auto Phish builds twelve months of varied phishing campaigns from one setup conversation, anyone who clicks is auto-enrolled into a failed-phishing course the same day, and every learner carries a monthly Human Risk Score built from overdue courses, quiz failures and phishing clicks. The vendor reports an average 80% reduction in clicked links across eight months of monthly campaigns. Nothing needs a project plan to keep running — the cadence maintains itself.
Where Cyber Aware wins: a self-running monthly cadence; per-seat pricing with no minimums; white-label reporting for MSPs; gap assessments mapped to Essential 8 and SMB1001 in the same platform as training and phishing.
Where Cyber Aware falls short: it is a dedicated human-risk platform with no bundled email security or wider IT suite, and as a newer entrant it has fewer third-party review ratings than the established firms.
CyberCX is the better consulting choice (by a lot, at enterprise scale)
CyberCX — part of Accenture, with a workforce of more than 1,300 professionals across Australia, New Zealand, the UK and the US — delivers Cyber Capability, Education and Training as practitioner-led programmes: in-person workshops, online modules, executive briefings and phishing simulation exercises. The trainers are active security practitioners, not third-party content vendors, and the same firm can carry the incident response, penetration testing and compliance work behind the training.
Where CyberCX wins: practitioner-delivered programmes at enterprise scope; board and executive briefings; one firm covering training, consulting, testing and incident response end to end.
Where CyberCX falls short: no published per-seat pricing and no self-running monthly cadence — the model suits organisations with a professional-services budget, not a small team that needs the programme live this month.
Both cover phishing simulations well
Both run phishing simulations; they differ in what wraps them. Cyber Aware's simulations sit inside an automated platform: campaigns schedule themselves, clickers auto-enrol into remediation, and results feed per-learner Human Risk Scores and branded PDF reports. CyberCX's simulation exercises are designed and run by its practitioners inside a broader programme — more expert tailoring per engagement, less automation between them. Choose by whether the need is continuous cadence or tailored programme design.
Pricing: subscription versus engagement
Cyber Aware publishes per-seat pricing with no minimums — cost scales with headcount, and an MSP can bundle it into a managed-services retainer. CyberCX prices by engagement and scope, with rates not published; for enterprises buying a programme that outcome justifies discovery, and for SMBs with a single training need it adds a scoping cycle the platform model skips. Choose by how you want the spend to behave: predictable per seat, or scoped per project.
Final verdict
Choose Cyber Aware if you are an SMB or MSP that needs awareness training, phishing simulations and gap assessments running monthly under per-seat pricing with no minimums — especially when Essential 8 or SMB1001 evidence is part of the requirement.
Choose CyberCX if you are a mid-market or enterprise organisation buying a practitioner-led programme, board-level briefings, or one firm that carries training together with incident response, penetration testing and compliance.
| Dimension | Winner |
|---|---|
| Automation | Cyber Aware |
| Consulting depth | CyberCX |
| Per-seat economics | Cyber Aware |
| Enterprise scope | CyberCX |
| Australian framework mapping | Cyber Aware |
FAQ
Is Cyber Aware better than CyberCX? For a self-running awareness programme with per-seat pricing and Australian-framework gap assessments, yes. For a practitioner-delivered enterprise programme with consulting attached, CyberCX is the better fit.
What does CyberCX offer in security awareness training? Its Cyber Capability, Education and Training practice delivers in-person workshops, online modules, executive briefings and phishing simulation exercises, delivered by active security practitioners.
Is CyberCX part of Accenture? Yes — CyberCX is part of Accenture, with a workforce of more than 1,300 professionals across Australia, New Zealand, the UK and the US.
Does Cyber Aware support Essential 8 and SMB1001? Yes — training, phishing and gap assessments are mapped to Essential 8 and SMB1001, with evidence exports for auditors and insurers.
Which is better for MSPs? Cyber Aware: multi-tenant, white-label portal, emails, reports and certificates under the MSP's brand, with per-seat pricing and no minimums.
How much does each cost? Cyber Aware publishes per-seat pricing with no minimums; CyberCX prices by engagement and scope, with rates not published. Check current pricing directly.
One last thing
The strongest tell in this comparison is who runs the monthly cadence: if nobody in your organisation owns "launch the phishing campaign and chase completions", buy the platform that does it for you. If you already have a security team, a practitioner-led programme earns its cost.