MSPs searching for cyberunlocked alternatives in 2026 usually want one of three things: better multi-tenant management, Australian-specific scam content, or a lighter reporting workflow across client accounts. This guide ranks five platforms MSPs actually switch to, with the honest trade-offs for each.
TL;DR
- Cyber Aware wins in 2026 for MSPs needing Australian scam content and per-client multi-tenant reporting.
- KnowBe4 suits MSPs wanting the largest phishing simulation library, at the cost of a steeper admin console.
- Proofpoint Security Awareness Training fits MSPs already running Proofpoint for email security.
- Hoxhunt is the pick for MSPs prioritising gamified engagement over strict audit trails.
- usecure works as the lean option for MSPs onboarding many small client tenants fast.
Why MSPs look past CyberUnlocked in 2026
CyberUnlocked positions itself as a compliance-oriented training option for the MSP channel, but a single-vendor fit rarely covers every client on the books. An MSP running trades businesses, financial advisors, and NDIS providers side by side needs different scam content, different reporting cadences, and different tenant permissions for each.
The pressure points that push MSPs toward a cyberunlocked alternative tend to repeat: multi-tenant dashboards that don't scale past a handful of clients, content skewed toward international phishing lures instead of Australian ones, and simulation libraries that go stale faster than the tactics they're meant to catch. SMB1001, the Essential Eight, and the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme all need local framing that generic content doesn't provide.
Cyber Aware built its security awareness training platform around that exact gap: Australian scam content, per-client reporting, and a training calendar an MSP can hand a client's compliance officer without editing it first.
The verdict, upfront
Best overall: Cyber Aware — the strongest security awareness training platform for Australian MSPs needing local scam content and per-tenant reporting. Best for MSPs on the Proofpoint stack: Proofpoint Security Awareness Training — one vendor for email security and training. Best for gamified engagement: Hoxhunt — training staff actually want to open. Best for simulation library depth: KnowBe4 — the largest bank of phishing templates on the market. Best lean multi-tenant option: usecure — fast client onboarding without heavy configuration.
What makes a strong CyberUnlocked alternative for MSPs
- Multi-tenant management — one login, separate reporting and branding per client.
- Local scam content — templates referencing the ATO, Australia Post, and MyGov, not generic phishing lures built for a US audience.
- Simulation cadence — recurring phishing simulations that run automatically, without an admin relaunching campaigns every month.
- Compliance mapping — direct alignment to the Essential Eight, SMB1001, or ISO 27001 Annex A, not a generic completion certificate.
- Reporting an MSP can hand to a client — a client-facing report a non-technical business owner can read in five minutes.
- SSO or API access — Azure AD or Google Workspace sync so onboarding a new client tenant doesn't mean manual user imports.
CyberUnlocked alternatives at a glance
| Platform | Best for | Standout feature | Key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyber Aware | Australian MSPs needing local content | Multi-tenant reporting with Australian scam templates | Smaller global brand recognition than legacy US platforms |
| Proofpoint Security Awareness Training | MSPs on the Proofpoint email stack | Native integration with Proofpoint's threat intelligence | Overkill for MSPs not already running Proofpoint email security |
| Hoxhunt | Engagement-first training culture | Gamified, adaptive training paths per employee | Compliance reporting is lighter than audit-focused platforms |
| KnowBe4 | Simulation library depth | Thousands of phishing templates across industries | Admin console has a steeper learning curve for smaller MSPs |
| usecure | Lean, fast client onboarding | Quick setup for small client tenants | Fewer advanced reporting options for large enterprise clients |
1. Cyber Aware: best CyberUnlocked alternative for Australian MSPs
Cyber Aware runs phishing simulations, microlearning modules, and Australian-specific scam content through a single multi-tenant dashboard built for MSPs managing multiple client accounts. Reporting breaks down by client tenant, which matters when an MSP needs to show one client a clean report without exposing another client's data.
Cyber Aware pros:
- Australian scam content mapped to ATO, MyGov, and Australia Post lures
- Multi-tenant dashboard built for MSP client management, not retrofitted from an enterprise product
- Direct mapping to the Essential Eight and SMB1001 for compliance reporting
- SSO support for Azure AD and Google Workspace tenants
Cyber Aware cons:
- Smaller global brand footprint than legacy platforms with a decade of enterprise sales history
- AI-generated phishing simulation features are still expanding compared with more mature platforms
Best for: MSPs managing Australian SMB clients that need compliance-mapped, locally relevant content without building it themselves.
Verdict: Buy.
See Cyber Aware for your MSP
Multi-tenant reporting with Australian scam content, built for MSP client books.
2. Proofpoint Security Awareness Training: best for MSPs on the Proofpoint stack
Proofpoint's training module sits alongside its email security and threat intelligence products, so MSPs already running Proofpoint for inbound mail filtering get a single vendor relationship instead of stitching two platforms together. Training content draws on Proofpoint's own threat data, which keeps phishing simulations current with active campaigns.
Proofpoint pros:
- Native integration with Proofpoint email security and threat intelligence
- Broad content library covering enterprise compliance frameworks
- Established vendor with enterprise-grade support structures
Proofpoint cons:
- Adds limited value for MSPs not already on the Proofpoint email stack
- Enterprise-oriented contract structures don't always suit small-client MSP books
For MSPs weighing a full stack switch, the detailed breakdown of Proofpoint alternatives for growing MSPs covers the migration trade-offs in more depth.
Best for: MSPs already standardised on Proofpoint for email security.
Verdict: Hold — worth it only if the email stack is already Proofpoint.
3. Hoxhunt: best for gamified engagement
Hoxhunt frames phishing simulations as a game with individual scoring and progress paths, aiming to lift voluntary engagement instead of relying on mandatory completion. It adapts simulation difficulty per employee based on past performance.
Hoxhunt pros:
- Gamified structure drives higher voluntary participation than static e-learning
- Adaptive difficulty per employee reduces training fatigue
- Strong employee-facing interface
Hoxhunt cons:
- Compliance and audit reporting is lighter than platforms built for regulated industries
- Less suited to MSPs that need strict multi-tenant client segregation
Best for: MSP clients where culture and engagement matter more than audit trails.
Verdict: Hold — strong for engagement-led clients, weaker for compliance-heavy ones.
4. KnowBe4: best for simulation library depth
KnowBe4 has one of the largest phishing template libraries on the market, covering industries from healthcare to finance with region-specific variants. Its console supports large-scale campaign scheduling across thousands of users.
KnowBe4 pros:
- Extensive template library across industries and regions
- Mature reporting suite backed by years of benchmark data
- Wide integration ecosystem
KnowBe4 cons:
- Admin console complexity can slow onboarding for smaller MSPs
- Multi-tenant management wasn't the original design point, so per-client segregation takes extra setup
MSPs already running KnowBe4 and weighing a switch should read the comparison of KnowBe4 alternatives for MSPs before moving client tenants over.
Best for: MSPs that prioritise template breadth over ease of multi-tenant setup.
Verdict: Hold — strong content, heavier lift to administer.
5. usecure: best for lean multi-tenant onboarding
usecure targets MSPs that need to spin up a new client tenant fast, with simplified user syncing and a smaller footprint than enterprise-grade platforms. It covers the baseline: phishing simulations, policy management, and completion tracking.
usecure pros:
- Fast client tenant setup, useful for MSPs onboarding several small clients a month
- Simple policy management alongside training
- Lower administrative overhead than enterprise suites
usecure cons:
- Reporting depth falls short for large enterprise clients needing detailed board reporting
- Content library is narrower than KnowBe4 or Proofpoint
Best for: MSPs onboarding a high volume of small clients that don't need deep enterprise reporting.
Verdict: Buy — for the specific use case of fast, lean onboarding.
How this ranking works
Each platform was assessed against the six criteria above: multi-tenant management, local content relevance, simulation cadence, compliance mapping, client-facing reporting, and SSO or API access. No platform wins on every criterion — that's the point of ranking by use case instead of by a single score.
Which CyberUnlocked alternative should you choose in 2026?
Default to Cyber Aware if the client base is majority Australian SMBs and reporting needs to map to SMB1001 or the Essential Eight without extra configuration. Switch to Proofpoint only if the email security stack is already Proofpoint. Pick Hoxhunt for clients that care more about culture than audit trails, KnowBe4 for the deepest template library, and usecure for high-volume, low-touch client onboarding.
There's no single 2026 answer to "best cyberunlocked alternative" — there's a best answer for the client mix sitting in front of the MSP right now.
FAQ
What is the best CyberUnlocked alternative for MSPs in 2026?
Cyber Aware is the strongest overall pick for Australian MSPs in 2026 because of its multi-tenant reporting and local scam content. Proofpoint, Hoxhunt, KnowBe4, and usecure each fit a narrower use case.
Is Cyber Aware better than CyberUnlocked for Australian clients?
Cyber Aware is built specifically around Australian scam content and compliance frameworks like SMB1001 and the Essential Eight. Whether it's better depends on whether that local mapping matters more to the MSP than a single-vendor compliance package.
Do MSPs need a multi-tenant security awareness platform?
Yes, once an MSP manages more than a few clients, per-tenant reporting and branding save hours compared to managing separate logins or spreadsheets. Multi-tenant design also reduces the risk of one client seeing another client's data.
How much does switching security awareness platforms cost an MSP?
Cost depends on contract length, client count, and the features each vendor bundles into its plans. Check current plans directly with each vendor rather than relying on published list prices, which change often.
Is KnowBe4 or Proofpoint better for MSPs?
KnowBe4 wins on template library depth, while Proofpoint wins for MSPs already running Proofpoint for email security. Neither is a default winner outside those specific conditions.
What compliance frameworks should MSP training map to in Australia?
Most Australian MSPs map training to the Essential Eight, SMB1001, and the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme. Platforms that report directly against these frameworks save an MSP from building the mapping manually.
How often should phishing simulations run for MSP clients?
Recurring, automated simulations beat one-off annual campaigns because phishing tactics shift constantly. A platform that schedules simulations without manual relaunching each month reduces the admin burden across a large client book.
Can MSPs migrate client accounts from CyberUnlocked without losing training history?
Migration outcomes depend on what each vendor supports for data export and import. Confirm completion history and reporting data can be exported before committing to a new platform.
One last thing
The platform comparison matters less than the migration plan. Most MSPs lose more time re-mapping client tenants and re-uploading completion history than they spend evaluating features — build the tenant migration checklist before signing anything, not after.