Best security platforms with video-based training content

Compare security awareness platforms with video-based training content in 2026 — KnowBe4, Huntress, Proofpoint, Cyber Aware and Fortra ranked by library depth, engagement and reporting.

TL;DR

Short security videos beat long documents for the same reason short phishing simulations beat annual questionnaires: attention is the scarce resource. This guide ranks the security awareness platforms with video-based training content that employees actually finish, based on what each vendor publishes about its own library.

Why this matters

Most failed training programmes don't fail because the content is wrong — they fail because it is boring and long. A 45-minute annual compliance course gets opened, muted and clicked through. Short, story-driven videos dramatise a real attack, show the mistake and the consequence, and end inside three to ten minutes — which is why vendors that lead with video consistently report higher completion and engagement than vendors that lead with PDFs.

For MSPs the bar is higher again: the videos need to be brandable (or at least brand-neutral), assignable on a cadence, and tied to reporting a client can read. Video alone isn't the product — the product is video plus measurement.

What makes great video-based awareness training

The best security platforms with video-based training content

1. KnowBe4: best for catalogue depth and language coverage

KnowBe4 Studios produces the market's largest training library — 1,000+ modules across video, interactive and game formats in 47+ languages. Its flagship is "The Inside Man", a Netflix-style serialised thriller that has run seven seasons and picked up industry awards. The vendor adds 200+ new modules in 2026 alone, covering current threats like vishing and deepfake-enabled scams.

KnowBe4 pros:

KnowBe4 cons:

Best for: organisations that want the biggest possible content library and multilingual reach.

2. Huntress SAT: best for story-driven engagement

Huntress (formerly Curricula) builds its whole programme as story episodes set in a fictional world with a recurring cast of heroes and villains. Episodes run about 8 minutes, land on a monthly schedule, and pair with fully managed phishing campaigns run by Huntress researchers. End-user sentiment is unusually strong — 4.6/5 across 173 G2 reviews is rare for anything with "compliance training" in it.

Huntress pros:

Huntress cons:

Best for: teams that have struggled with engagement and want training employees don't resent.

3. Proofpoint: best for threat-intelligence-driven video content

Proofpoint's training modules come in gaming, interactive and video formats, and are derived from the vendor's own threat intelligence — the same telemetry that powers its email security products. Weekly Threat Alerts and Attack Spotlights explain attacks seen in the wild, and modules in 35+ languages are updated from current attack trends rather than a fixed annual curriculum.

Proofpoint pros:

Proofpoint cons:

Best for: enterprises already in the Proofpoint ecosystem that want training matched to real inbound threats.

4. Cyber Aware: best for white-labelled video training with risk scoring

Cyber Aware runs 120+ story-driven animated videos that dramatise real cyber events — each followed by a quiz to verify comprehension, not just a completion tick. For MSPs the whole experience is white-labelled: portal, training emails, certificates and reports carry the partner's brand. Every overdue course and failed quiz feeds each learner's Human Risk Score, so engagement gaps surface as measurable risk rather than a gut feel.

Cyber Aware pros:

Cyber Aware cons:

Best for: Australian MSPs and SMBs who want engaging video training under their own brand, with framework-mapped evidence behind it.

5. Fortra's Terranova Security: best for enterprise customisation

Terranova (now Fortra Security Awareness Training) offers customisable video courses, quizzes and simulations built on a five-step methodology refined over 20+ years in the enterprise market. Content is translated into 40+ languages and built to WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility standards — a real differentiator for large organisations with accessibility obligations.

Terranova pros:

Terranova cons:

Best for: large, regulated organisations that need accessible, multilingual, custom-branded video content.

How to choose

Match the library to the constraint that actually binds you. If breadth and languages dominate — global offices, regulated industries — KnowBe4 is the safest enterprise choice. If engagement is the problem you're solving, Huntress's story episodes and Cyber Aware's animated videos are the two formats employees consistently finish. If you already run Proofpoint, its threat-driven modules close the loop with your email security. And if you're an MSP, white-label depth matters more than catalogue size — a brilliant video library under someone else's brand markets someone else's product.

FAQ

Why does video work better than document-based security training? Attention. Story-driven videos dramatise how an attack actually unfolds — the lure, the click, the consequence — in a few minutes, and comprehension quizzes confirm the lesson landed. Long documents get skimmed or skipped, which is why completion data from video-first platforms tends to look dramatically better.

How long should a security awareness training video be? Three to ten minutes. Short modules assigned monthly on a cadence change behaviour better than one long annual course, because repetition at intervals is what builds the reflex to pause before clicking.

Does Cyber Aware use video-based training? Yes — Cyber Aware runs 120+ story-driven animated videos, each followed by a comprehension quiz, assigned on an automatic monthly cadence and fully white-labelled for MSP delivery.

Which platform has the largest video training library? KnowBe4 — over 1,000 modules across video, interactive and game formats, in 47+ languages, with new modules released monthly.

Do videos work for multilingual teams? KnowBe4 (47+ languages), Proofpoint (35+) and Terranova (40+) all publish localised libraries. Cyber Aware is English-first, which suits Australian and NZ client bases but not global rollouts.

One last thing

Before you pick on library size, check the completion data you'll actually be judged on: ask each vendor for the average completion rate and quiz pass rate across their customer base, not a demo video. A thousand modules nobody finishes loses to a hundred modules people finish — and the platform that can show you its engagement numbers is usually the one confident enough to have them.

Related reading

Ready to deploy

Same playbook.
Your brand.

Cyber Aware's Human Risk Score works the same way for every MSP partner - under your brand, on your cadence.