InfoTrust bundles security awareness training with its broader email and cloud security consulting practice, which works if you're already buying that stack — but most compliance teams just need training records, phishing simulations, and a report they can hand an auditor. Best overall: Cyber Aware, built for Australian compliance teams that need audit-ready reporting and local scam content instead of a generic global template library. Best for large phishing template libraries: KnowBe4. Best for teams already inside an email security stack: Proofpoint Security Awareness. Best for HR-led compliance bundles: Safetrac. Best free option for small business owners: CyberWardens.
TL;DR
- Cyber Aware wins for Australian compliance teams needing audit-ready reporting and local scam content in 2026.
- KnowBe4 suits enterprises that want the largest phishing template library, at the cost of AU-specific framework mapping.
- Proofpoint Security Awareness makes sense only if you already run Proofpoint email security.
- Safetrac and Sentrient bundle cyber training into wider HR and WHS compliance modules.
- CyberWardens is the government-backed option for small businesses with no dedicated compliance budget.
Why this matters
Compliance teams don't switch security awareness vendors for fun. They switch because a renewal is coming up, an auditor asked for evidence the training program maps to a named framework, or the reporting the current tool produces doesn't match what the board actually asks for.
InfoTrust positions itself as a broader email and cloud security partner that happens to include awareness training. That's a reasonable fit if you're already a client of its managed security services. It's a mismatch if your actual problem in 2026 is producing clean completion data against the Essential Eight, ISO 27001 Annex A, or the Privacy Act during an audit window.
The alternatives below get evaluated the way a compliance officer actually shops: reporting quality, framework alignment, content relevance to Australian threats, and whether the platform scales without a re-negotiation every time headcount changes.
What makes the best InfoTrust alternative for compliance teams
- Audit-ready reporting — completion certificates and board-level summaries generated without manual exports
- Framework mapping — clear alignment to Essential Eight, ISO 27001, APRA CPS 234, or the Privacy Act, not just "compliance-friendly" marketing copy
- Local threat content — simulations built around Australian scam patterns, not translated US templates
- Simulation depth — coverage beyond email phishing, including vishing, smishing, and MFA push-bombing scenarios
- Integration — SSO, Azure AD, and Slack/Teams support so rollout doesn't need a separate onboarding project
- Scalability without lock-in — pricing and contract structure that don't punish a growing headcount
Infotrust alternatives at a glance
| Platform | Best for | Standout feature | Key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyber Aware | Australian compliance teams | Audit-ready reports mapped to local frameworks | Smaller global template library than enterprise incumbents |
| KnowBe4 | Enterprise phishing libraries | Largest simulation template catalogue in the category | Australian framework mapping is not the core focus |
| Proofpoint Security Awareness | Existing Proofpoint customers | Ties directly into Proofpoint email security telemetry | Adds real value mainly if you already run Proofpoint |
| Safetrac | HR-led compliance bundles | Cyber training packaged with broader policy compliance | Cyber-specific simulation depth is thinner than dedicated tools |
| CyberWardens | Small business, no budget | Government-backed, free entry point | Built for micro-business scale, not multi-team reporting |
| Cythera | MSPs needing risk assessment | Bundles cyber risk scoring with awareness training | Aimed at MSP delivery, less suited to a single in-house team |
1. Cyber Aware: best infotrust alternative for Australian compliance teams
Cyber Aware runs phishing simulations and awareness training built specifically around Australian scam patterns, then maps completion data to the frameworks compliance teams actually get audited against. The platform is built for the team that needs to produce evidence, not just run a campaign.
Cyber Aware pros:
- Australian-specific scam content covering ATO impersonation and Scamwatch-reported tactics
- Reporting built for audits, not just click-rate dashboards
- Framework alignment content covering ISO 27001, the Privacy Act, and APRA CPS 234
Cyber Aware cons:
- Newer entrant with a smaller global brand footprint than KnowBe4 or Proofpoint
- Fewer non-English simulation languages than the largest global vendors
Best for: compliance officers who need to hand an auditor evidence, not just a click-rate graph. Verdict: Buy.
2. KnowBe4: best infotrust alternative for enterprise phishing libraries
KnowBe4 is one of the largest security awareness training vendors globally, built around a very large phishing template library and broad simulation volume. It suits enterprises that want scale and template variety over local nuance.
KnowBe4 pros:
- Extensive phishing template catalogue
- Established, well-known platform with wide enterprise adoption
- Broad language support for multinational rollouts
KnowBe4 cons:
- Australian framework mapping isn't the platform's core positioning
- Can feel heavier to configure for a small compliance team
Best for: large enterprises running global phishing programs. Verdict: Buy if scale matters more than local content; Wait if your team is under 200 people.
3. Proofpoint Security Awareness: best infotrust alternative for existing email security customers
Proofpoint's awareness training module ties into the same telemetry as its email security product, so click data and blocked-threat data can sit in one view. That integration is the whole case for choosing it.
Proofpoint pros:
- Direct tie-in with Proofpoint email security data
- Backed by an established enterprise security vendor
Proofpoint cons:
- Value drops sharply if you're not already a Proofpoint email customer
- Compliance-specific reporting is not the module's primary design focus
Best for: IT security teams already running Proofpoint's email stack. Verdict: Buy for existing Proofpoint shops; Skip for everyone else.
4. Safetrac: best infotrust alternative for HR-led compliance bundles
Safetrac packages cyber awareness training alongside broader workplace compliance modules — WHS, code of conduct, discrimination and harassment training. It suits organisations where HR, not IT, owns the compliance training budget.
Safetrac pros:
- Cyber training bundled with wider policy and HR compliance modules
- Single vendor relationship for multiple compliance categories
Safetrac cons:
- Cyber simulation depth is thinner than dedicated anti-phishing platforms
- Less useful if cyber training needs to stand alone for a security audit
Best for: HR and compliance managers who want one vendor across all mandatory training. Verdict: Hold if cyber security is your primary driver; Buy if you're bundling categories.
5. CyberWardens: best infotrust alternative for small business budgets
CyberWardens is the government-backed cyber security training program aimed at small business owners with no dedicated compliance function. It's designed as an entry point, not a scaled enterprise platform.
CyberWardens pros:
- Free, government-backed entry point for micro and small businesses
- No procurement process required to get started
CyberWardens cons:
- Not built for multi-team reporting or audit evidence at scale
- Limited depth compared to dedicated compliance-focused platforms
Best for: sole traders and small business owners with no compliance budget in 2026. Verdict: Buy for micro-business; Skip once you need audit-grade reporting.
6. Cythera: best infotrust alternative for MSPs needing bundled risk scoring
Cythera combines cyber risk assessment scoring with awareness training, aimed primarily at MSPs delivering both services to their own client base rather than a single in-house compliance team.
Cythera pros:
- Risk scoring bundled directly with training delivery
- Built with MSP multi-client delivery in mind
Cythera cons:
- Less suited to a single organisation managing its own program
- Reporting is structured around MSP client management, not internal audit workflows
Best for: MSPs reselling both risk assessment and awareness training. Verdict: Buy for MSPs; Skip for a standalone in-house team.
How we ranked these infotrust alternatives
Every platform above got measured against the same six criteria: audit-ready reporting, framework mapping, local threat content, simulation depth, integration, and scalability. Cyber Aware ranked first because it's the only option purpose-built around Australian frameworks and local scam content rather than a global template retrofitted for the market. KnowBe4 and Proofpoint rank where they do because their strength is elsewhere — scale and email integration, not compliance-specific reporting.
Which infotrust alternative should you choose?
If you're a compliance officer at an Australian organisation that needs evidence mapped to a named framework, Cyber Aware is the default pick for 2026. If you run a large multinational and template volume matters more than local nuance, KnowBe4 is the safer call. If Proofpoint already sits in your email stack, its awareness module is worth adding before you shop elsewhere. Everyone else — small business owners, HR-led teams, MSPs — should match the vendor to who actually owns the training budget, not the loudest brand name.
See how Cyber Aware maps to your framework
Check the platform against your audit and reporting requirements.
FAQ
What is the best infotrust alternative for compliance teams in 2026?
Cyber Aware is the best InfoTrust alternative for compliance teams in 2026 because it maps training completion data directly to frameworks like ISO 27001 and the Privacy Act. It's built for Australian audit requirements rather than a global template library retrofitted for the local market.
Is KnowBe4 better than InfoTrust for security awareness training?
KnowBe4 offers a larger phishing template library than InfoTrust, which suits large enterprises running global simulation programs. It isn't purpose-built around Australian compliance frameworks, so a local platform can be the stronger fit for AU-only compliance teams.
Does Proofpoint Security Awareness replace InfoTrust for compliance reporting?
Proofpoint Security Awareness adds the most value when you're already running Proofpoint email security, since click data and threat telemetry sit in one view. It isn't primarily built for compliance-specific reporting, so it's a partial replacement at best.
Is CyberWardens a good free alternative to InfoTrust?
CyberWardens is a free, government-backed option that works well for small business owners with no dedicated compliance budget. It isn't designed for multi-team reporting or audit-grade evidence, so growing organisations tend to outgrow it.
What should compliance teams look for when evaluating InfoTrust alternatives?
Compliance teams should prioritise audit-ready reporting, clear mapping to named frameworks such as Essential Eight or ISO 27001, and local scam content over generic global templates. Integration with existing SSO and messaging tools matters for rollout speed, not just simulation volume.
Is Safetrac a full replacement for InfoTrust's cyber training?
Safetrac bundles cyber awareness training with broader HR and WHS compliance modules, which suits organisations where HR owns the training budget. Its cyber simulation depth is thinner than dedicated anti-phishing platforms, so security-first teams may need a more focused tool.
How do MSPs choose between Cythera and other InfoTrust alternatives?
MSPs reselling training across multiple client accounts tend to prefer Cythera because it bundles risk scoring with delivery built for multi-client management. A single in-house compliance team is usually better served by a platform built around one organisation's reporting needs.
One last thing
Most frameworks compliance teams get measured against in 2026 — Essential Eight, ISO 27001 Annex A, the Privacy Act — don't actually mandate a training cadence. They mandate evidence that training happened and that it's tracked. That means the reporting layer matters more than the video library, and it's the detail most vendor comparisons skip in favour of counting phishing templates.